Self Profession:Social Worker
Spouse Profession:Business
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Chhattisgarh 2018 | Rs3,47,37,677 ~3 Crore+ | 2 |
Chattisgarh 2008 | Rs2,97,56,433 ~2 Crore+ | 2 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2012 - 2013 | Rs 94,644 ~ 94 Thou+ |
spouse | Y | 2012 - 2013 | Rs 2,10,000 ~ 2 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable |
1 | 120B, 420, 468, 471 | Case No.10/2003 (Old No. 3301/2001), FIR No-RC No. 5(E)/97/SIU(X)/CBI, New Delhi, CBI/SIU(x)/New Delhi, Court Taking Cognizance-The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate CBI, Indore (M.P.), Date of Cognizance-19 Sept.2001, Court Which Framed Charge- The Additional Chief Judicial Magisrate CBI, Indore(MP), Date of Charge Framed-24 Oct.2007, Yes;The H'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench Vide Order dated 21st August 2009 has set aside the impugned order of ACJM, CBI, Indore date 24 Oct.2007 and discharge of charge under section 120-B read with section 420,468,471 of Indian Panel Code.The CBI's Appeal is lying pending before the H'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable |
1 | 380, 406, 454, 420 | Court Taking Cognizance- Judicial Magistrate, Class-I, Raipur, Case No.1329/06(Old No.65/1990), Dated of Cognizance-17 Feb.1990 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.