TIRUCHENDUR Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:TIRUCHENDUR

Generated Saturday 20th of April 2024 03:08:18 PM

Name	Age	Gender	Party Code	Criminal Cases	No. of Cases	Education Level	Movable Assets	Immovable Assets	Total Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y or N)
Anitha R Radhakrishnan	65	M	DMK	Yes	16	10th Pass	1,11,36,944 ~ 1 Crore+	2,98,39,386 ~ 2 Crore+	4,09,76,330 ~ 4 Crore+	0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 3 IPC Details* Attempt to murder(307), Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc.(436), Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine(474), Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment(109), Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B), Punishment for Rioting(147), Rioting, armed with deadly weapon(148), Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149), Punishment for wrongful restraint(341), Punishment for cheating by personation(419), Forgery(463), Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Jeyaraman.v	37	M	BJP	No	0	Graduate	91,42,780 ~ 91 Lacs+	3,33,12,500 ~ 3 Crore+	4,24,55,280 ~ 4 Crore+	1,15,36,973 ~ 1 Crore+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Kumara Gurupara Adithan D.	48	M	Pattali Makkal Katchi	No	0	Graduate	9,80,000 ~ 9 Lacs+	75,00,000 ~ 75 Lacs+	84,80,000 ~ 84 Lacs+	21,42,500 ~ 21 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Sarathkumar.r	61	M	AIADMK	Yes	2	Graduate	17,94,60,358 ~ 17 Crore+	46,37,50,000 ~ 46 Crore+	64,32,10,358 ~ 64 Crore+	17,63,96,017 ~ 17 Crore+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 1 IPC Details* Illegal payments in connection with an election(171H), Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly(143), Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant(188),

*171H Illegal payments in connection with an election , 307 Attempt to murder , 436 Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc. , 474 Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine , 109 Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 143 Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly , 147 Punishment for Rioting , 148 Rioting, armed with deadly weapon , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 188 Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant , 341 Punishment for wrongful restraint , 419 Punishment for cheating by personation , 463 Forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from TIRUCHENDUR constituency (THOOTHUKUDI).

Share On:

Download App

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs