Advanced search ..
HomeMaharashtra Local Body 2015

Maharashtra Local Body 2015

Election Summary

HIGHLIGHTS OF CANDIDATES
Total number of constituencies analyzed=438
Total candidates analyzed by NEW = 1991
Candidates with declared criminal cases = 291 (15%)
Candidates with declared serious criminal cases = 205 (10%)
Crorepati candidates = 572 (29%)
Candidates who are graduate or above = 463 (23%)
Candidates who have not declared PAN = 333 (17%)
Total women candidates = 1065 (53%)
Total candidates who have filed ITR = 802 (40%)
HIGHLIGHTS OF WINNERS
 
Total winners analyzed by NEW = 408
Winners with declared criminal cases = 80 (20%)
Winners with declared serious criminal cases = 60 (15%)
Crorepati winners = 235 (58%)
Winners who are graduate or above = 104 (25%)
Winners who have not declared PAN = 49 (12%)
Total women winners = 226 (55%)
Total winners who have filed ITR = 217 (53%)

List of constituencies (Ward wise)

AMRAVATI
 
AURANGABAD
 
DHULE
 
KALYAN DOMBIVLI
35: WARD NO.2

46: WARD NO.3

57: WARD NO.4

68: WARD NO.5

100: WARD NO.79

102: WARD NO.80

103: WARD NO.81

104: WARD NO.82

105: WARD NO.83

106: WARD NO.84

107: WARD NO.85

108: WARD NO.86

109: WARD NO.87

110: WARD NO.88

111: WARD NO.89

112: WARD NO.9

113: WARD NO.90

114: WARD NO.91

115: WARD NO.92

116: WARD NO.93

117: WARD NO.94

118: WARD NO.95

119: WARD NO.96

120: WARD NO.97

121: WARD NO.98

122: WARD NO.99

 
KOLHAPUR
12: WARD NO.2

23: WARD NO.3

34: WARD NO.4

45: WARD NO.5

56: WARD NO.6

67: WARD NO.7

78: WARD NO.8

81: WARD NO.9

 
NASIK
 
NAVI MUMBAI
 
PARBHANI
 
THANE
 
VASAI VIRAR
28: WARD NO.2

39: WARD NO.3

50: WARD NO.4

61: WARD NO.5

72: WARD NO.6

83: WARD NO.7

94: WARD NO.8

100: WARD NO.85

101: WARD NO.86

102: WARD NO.87

103: WARD NO.88

104: WARD NO.89

105: WARD NO.9

106: WARD NO.90

107: WARD NO.91

108: WARD NO.92

109: WARD NO.93

110: WARD NO.94

111: WARD NO.95

112: WARD NO.96

113: WARD NO.97

114: WARD NO.98

115: WARD NO.99

 

Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.

Technology Powered by Webrosoft