Advanced search
HomeKarnataka 2008

Karnataka 2008

Election Summary

HIGHLIGHTS OF CANDIDATES
Total number of constituencies analyzed=225
Total candidates analyzed by NEW = 1847
Candidates with declared criminal cases = 195 (11%)
Candidates with declared serious criminal cases = 73 (4%)
Crorepati candidates = 451 (24%)
Candidates who are graduate or above = 804 (44%)
Candidates who have not declared PAN = 1247 (68%)
Total women candidates = 72 (4%)
HIGHLIGHTS OF WINNERS
 
Total winners analyzed by NEW = 218
Winners with declared criminal cases = 44 (20%)
Winners with declared serious criminal cases = 18 (8%)
Crorepati winners = 139 (64%)
Winners who are graduate or above = 117 (54%)
Winners who have not declared PAN = 80 (37%)
Total women winners = 1 (0%)

List of constituencies (District Wise)

BAGALKOT
1: Badami

3: Bilgi

4: Hungund

6: Mudhol

7: Terdal

 
BANGALORE
12: Hebbal

13: Jayanagar

14: K.R. Pura

26: Yelahanka

 
BANGALORE RURAL
1: Anekal

 
BELGAUM
2: Athani

8: Gokak

10: Kagwad

11: Khanapur

12: Kittur

13: Kudachi

14: Nippani

15: Ramdurg

16: Raybag

 
BELLARY
5: Kampli

6: Kudligi

7: Sandur

 
BIDAR
1: Aurad

3: Bhalki

4: Bidar

 
BIJAPUR
5: Indi

7: Nagthan

8: Sindgi

CHAMARAJANAGAR
3: Hanur

CHIKABALLAPUR
 
CHIKKAMANGALUR
 
CHITRADURGA
3: Hiriyur

 
DAKSHINA KANNADA
1: Bantval

7: Puttur

8: Sullia

DAVANAGERE
5: Harihar

6: Honnali

DHARWAD
1: Dharwad

6: Kundgol

 
GADAG
1: Gadag

2: Nargund

3: Ron

GULBARGA
2: Aland

9: Jevargi

10: Sedam

11: Shahapur

12: Shorapur

13: Yadgir

 
HASSAN
3: Belur

4: Hassan

 
HAVERI
1: Byadgi

2: Hangal

3: Haveri

 
KODAGU
 
KOLAR
2: Kolar

4: Malur

 
KOPPAL
 
MANDYA
4: Mandya

 
MYSORE
4: Hunsur

11: Varuna

 
RAICHUR
3: Manvi

4: Maski

5: Raichur

 
RAMANAGAR
4: Magadi

 
SHIMOGA
2: Sagar

4: Shimoga

6: Sorab

 
TUMKUR
2: Gubbi

4: Kunigal

7: Sira

8: Tiptur

 
UDUPI
1: Byndoor

2: Kapu

3: Karkal

5: Udupi

 
UTTARA KANNADA
1: Bhatkal

2: Haliyal

4: Kumta

5: Sirsi

 

Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.

Technology Powered by Webrosoft